![](http://www.maunlemke.com/uploads/letterHead.gif)
April 2004 Food For Thought **********************************************
FOOD FOR THOUGHT
Feeding Assistants: Causing a Mouth Full of Controversy
"What would you attempt to do if you knew you would not fail?" " Dr. Robert Schuller
In
September 2003, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)
created a new rule applying to nursing homes that receive Medicare or
Medicaid funding. The rule allows for trained assistants to help
residents with eating and drinking. The rule officially went into
effect on October 27, 2003, and it's sparked some heated debate" to say
the least.
Under the general guidelines of the rule, nursing
homes can hire feeding assistants who have passed a minimum eight-hour,
state-approved training course. These assistants are required to work
under the supervision of an RN or LPN. Also, the assistants can only
help residents who do not have complicated feeding needs" the facility's
charge nurse decides as to which residents are eligible to be helped by
the. The rule also states that staff should review each resident's last
assessment and plan of care to help determine his or her eligibility.
The Sweet Taste of Success Some
large agencies" including the American Health Care Association (AHCA)
and the American Association of Homes and Services for the Aging
(AAHSA) are proponents of the rule. Entities in favor of the
implementation of this rule say it will enable nursing facilities to
allocate resources more effectively to meet the needs of their
residents. They state that the ability to free up staff time is a
tremendous benefit the rule provides. It will allow for licensed
personnel to attend to those people who have more complex eating
problems, while the feeding assistants can tend to residents who do not
call for such skilled care. Even where facilities are highly staffed,
the rule still affords an opportunity for more one-on-one attention. It
also may expose some of these part-time feeding assistants to long-term
care as a profession, which could in turn help alleviate the staffing
problems many facilities face.
A Hint of Bitter While
some groups have come out in support of this new rule, it's leaving
many others with a bad taste in their mouth. Some prominent
consumer-oriented groups, such as AARP and the Alzheimer's Association
have come out against it.
Quite simply, some feel this rule
will cause harm to nursing home residents. Many critics feel the rule
is just a guise to avoid the nation's nursing home staffing crisis and
related problems, such as resident malnutrition and dehydration. Other
concerns skeptics include:
"¢ The eight-hour training course for
feeding assistants might be too short, and thus might not properly
equip workers with the skills they need to do the job right. "¢ The course need not be given by a licensed health care professional.
"¢ Feeding assistants need not pass a written competency test after taking the course. "¢ Assistants might take actions that are beyond their scope of training or be unable to handle emergency situations.
The Next Course of Action Now
that CMS has adopted this new regulation, its implementation rests in
the hands of the states. Some states say they are ready to go and
simply need to plug in some details to get their programs up and
running. Some must go to their respective state legislatures for
approval before proceeding. Other states like North Dakota and
Wisconsin have allowed paid feeding assistants to supplement nursing
staff for a number of years. Florida and Illinois have already passed
laws allowing for such workers, but have yet to implement them. In any
case, it's apparent that the future of feeding assistants will remain
in debate.
|